RH
Ryerson Holding Corp (RYI)·Q2 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2024 delivered revenue of $1.23B, diluted EPS of $0.29, and adjusted EBITDA (ex-LIFO) of $42.6M; shipments rose to 508k tons while ASP fell 3.2%, driving margin compression ex-LIFO to 17.4% .
- EPS exceeded guidance due to a $10M LIFO income swing (vs prior guidance for ~$1M LIFO expense), while revenue came in below expectations on late-quarter pricing weakness across carbon, aluminum, and stainless .
- Management raised annualized cost savings from ~$40M to ~$60M and cut operating expenses by $17.8M QoQ; buyback authorization was increased by $50M and extended to April 2026 .
- Q3 2024 outlook calls for softer volumes and pricing: revenue of $1.12–$1.16B, ASP down 3%–5%, adjusted EBITDA (ex-LIFO) $21–$25M, diluted EPS $0.01–$0.10; LIFO income expected ~$12M .
- Near-term stock narrative catalysts: accelerated cost actions ($60M annualized), buyback capacity increase, and optimization benefits from ERP and facility modernization amid a cyclical bottoming backdrop highlighted by management .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Shipments rose QoQ and YoY to 508k tons (+2.2% QoQ, +2.4% YoY), with Ryerson outpacing MSCI industry shipment trends in North America (+1.7% vs industry -0.2%) .
- Cost actions exceeded targets; operating expenses fell $17.8M QoQ, and annualized savings were raised to ~$60M from $40M: “we now believe we can annualize our cost savings to around $60 million” .
- EPS beat guidance on LIFO tailwind: “we exceeded our EPS guidance…driven by $10 million in LIFO income” .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue below expectations: $1.23B vs internal expectations, as ASP fell 3.2% QoQ across carbon (-0.9%), aluminum (-4.9%), and stainless (-1.9%) .
- Margin compression ex-LIFO: gross margin ex-LIFO slipped to 17.4% (down 20 bps QoQ and 130 bps YoY); adjusted EBITDA margin ex-LIFO narrowed to 3.5% .
- Leverage above target: net leverage rose to 3.2x (target 0.5x–2.0x) as net debt increased to $497M and global liquidity fell to $585M .
Financial Results
Core P&L and Operating Metrics (chronological order: oldest → newest)
Changes vs Prior Quarter and Prior Year
Segment/Product Breakdown
KPIs and Balance Sheet (chronological order: oldest → newest)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on cycle and positioning: “Counter cycles don’t last forever…we continue to build operating leverage and a better customer experience as more of our recent investments come online” .
- CFO on Q2 EPS beat vs guidance: “Our beat on EPS expectations was driven by $10 million in LIFO income…revenue…was lower than anticipated…price declines led to margin compression” .
- COO on pricing: “Average selling price per ton was down 3.2% QoQ…CRU hot-rolled coil prices decreased by 14%” .
- CEO on optimization benefits: “We redesigned e-commerce, repurchased 647,330 shares below book value, and exceeded our cost reduction targets for the quarter” .
Q&A Highlights
- Cost savings mix and sustainability: Majority of $18M OpEx reduction attributable to the $60M program; ~$4M YoY reduction from variable comp not included; further network optimization (logistics, fewer material touches) expected to drive incremental savings .
- Leverage and cash allocation: Near term focus on generating operating cash flow and lowering debt; opportunistic share repurchases below book value remain compelling .
- Inventory destocking: Industry months-on-hand remain elevated in stainless (3.1) and aluminum (2.7) vs carbon (~2.0), implying ongoing destocking in bright metals; Ryerson reducing elevated stainless/aluminum inventories while maintaining A-item service levels .
- Mix outlook: Expect carbon volumes to outpace stainless/aluminum in 2H’24 despite spot margin compression from HRC declines; July slower than prior six months .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus via S&P Global for Q2 2024 and surrounding periods was unavailable at the time of this analysis due to access limits; as a result, we cannot provide a quantitative comparison vs consensus for revenue/EPS/EBITDA.*
- Directionally, internal guidance comparison indicates Q2 EPS above guide (LIFO tailwind) while revenue and adjusted EBITDA ex-LIFO were below guide; Q3 guidance implies continued pressure on pricing and volumes .
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term headwinds are driven by price compression across carbon, aluminum, and stainless, with gross margin ex-LIFO trending lower; expect continued pressure into Q3 per guidance .
- Execution on optimization (ERP, logistics, facility upgrades) is translating to tangible cost reductions; annualized savings raised to ~$60M and further network efficiencies likely as modernization completes .
- Leverage elevated at 3.2x and liquidity down QoQ; management intends to generate cash and reduce ABL draws as investment cycle winds down, with Shelbyville modernization slated to start up in Q1 2025 .
- Product mix tilt: carbon volumes likely to outpace stainless/aluminum near term despite thinner carbon margins, while management remains long-term bullish on bright metals franchises .
- Capital returns remain active: $14M buybacks in Q2, authorization increased by $50M to April 2026, and dividend maintained at $0.1875—supporting downside and offering potential tactical support during cyclical bottoming .
- Tactical implication: Near-term results likely constrained by ASP/margin dynamics; monitor cost-savings flow-through, inventory normalization in bright metals, and sequential demand stabilization to time the cyclical turn .
- Medium-term thesis: As modernization benefits ramp and cycle normalizes, Ryerson’s operating leverage and value-add capabilities should expand through-the-cycle earnings with less volatility, positioning for improved ROIC and deleveraging .